Unfortunately, this is not accurate. Authorities do try to identify ingredients that qualify as novel foods and thus require authorisation. However, a positive notification does not provide evidence that one of the ingredients is not novel at closer inspection. Authorities may raise the issue at any time.
Generally recognised as safe (GRAS) is a legal concept in US law, whereas novel foods are a category in EU, UK law. While the same food products may go through a GRAS assessment and a novel food authorisation, the regulations and assessment processes are very different. Regulation of novel foods in Canada, Australia and New Zealand is different.
In the context of novel food legislation, foods are either novel or not novel. Foods that were used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Union before 15 May 1997 are simply “not novel”, according to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. The term “traditional food from a Third Country” means a novel food derived from primary production with a history of safe food use in a third country, that is novel for the EU, but not for a country outside the EU, such as China, or India. It has a facilitated approval route, though this applies only to some novel foods.
There is still a lack of legal certainty over novel food regulation, which is seriously hampering the functioning of the internal EU market. It seems that some authorities are using the novel food regulation to limit intra-EU trade. Each situation needs to be assessed carefully to respond in an appropriate manner. We have extensive experience in this field, with legal counsel support when needed.